On 09/20/2010 10:47 AM, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 20 Sep 2010, at 00:50, Joseph Wakeling wrote: > >> Hence why I say that the issue of effective microtonal support still >> requires action at the code level, and is not simply a matter of better >> documentation ... :-( > > I made a post about this issue last week, but there were no responses. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-09/msg00138.html
I saw the post but was not sure quite how to interpret it. Could you write up some more extensive notes on the algorithm and its aims and possibilities? I did wonder if the fact it was Haskell code was part of the reason for the lack of response. I have a lot of admiration for Haskell but I can see there being problems extending Lilypond with yet another language. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
