On 9/6/10 3:01 PM, "Neil Puttock" <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I wondered whether this is the right approach; perhaps we should > rethink the fix for issue #881 instead. Perhaps we should rethink the 881 fix, since it was always a bit mysterious why it worked. But I don't have any better ideas for solving 881. Do you? Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
