On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:47 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > >> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> There is sufficient disagreement that I consider it useful to get a >>> more qualified point of view. >> >> That would hurt if I didn't agree with you completely. :-) > > Why would it hurt you if I check what my actual efforts for "jumping > through the proper hoops" are?
no, no... that was a joke. I was making a joke about your (justified) saying that my point of view was not qualified. I mean, completely rewritten / reinterpreted for humorous effect: Carl: Graham said it was ok, so go ahead. David: yeah, well... Graham is an idiot, so I can't trust him. Graham: ouch, but not really, because I agree that I'm an idiot. ... ok, maybe it wasn't as funny as I thought it was initially. [which just lends further credence to my idiot-ness] Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
