On 30 July 2010 15:11, Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu> wrote: > This solution works for the minimal example given with the issue, and it > works in general if one accepts the assumption that there is no reason that > anything fed through stack-lines (in scm/stencil.scm) should have an X > extent whose left boundary is anything other than 0. However, I > don'tunderstand lilypond well enough to know: > > a) if this is a good assumption > b) if this assumption breaks something else.
You'll probably be interested in Alexander Kobel's patch for this (http://codereview.appspot.com/1689041/show). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
