Hi Reinhold,
On 28/07/10 01:43, reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001
File ly/init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode26
ly/init.ly:26: #(if (ly:get-option 'user-init)
On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
user-include ?
Hmm, actually, I don't like either user-init (indicates it's part of the
init sequence and has similar uses as the --init command line option;
also it sounds too technical) nor user-include (to me that sounds like
setting an include path)...
How about custom-definitions or user-definitions (no, sounds too much
like it defines users)?
How about --user-startup or --custom-startup?
The real problem you have here is that we use --init option to supersede
the whole startup/initialization file. This one is an additional one to
do just for this user session, so user-startup says what it does on the can.
Cheers,
Ian
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
