On 2010/06/29 23:58:07, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2010/06/18 21:56:10, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Sure, I'm happy to emend the description (I think Carl will be happy
too. ;) Yep!
Do you think the property name's OK though? I agree with Carl it
could be a bit
more descriptive, but then there's also the need to keep verbosity to
a minimum. I think that if we have to choose between verbosity and clarity, clarity should win. Although I prefer the shortest names we can use with clarity. Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/931041/show _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
