Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 17:05 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham Percival:
> I think it's worth waiting at least a day to see if anybody has > any suggestions. I mean, if there's a "I'm trying a new version > of the website, please watch urls containing /website/ closely!" > check-box on the google analytics website, it would be silly not > enable that. Sure. > Also: how many flashing "help wanted" signs do we have on the > website right now? If the -devel community wanted, we could > certainly resolve them all in 2-3 days. Is it worth doing that > before switch websites? Maybe, maybe not. I vote not. > What, just a 's/web/website/' in ~/web/.htaccess ? I expected it > to be a bit more involved than that (although still less than 10 > lines). Hmm, possibly we could even do mv web old-web && mv website web and update your update scripts accordingly :-) website is such a long word, no? > sorry, too much work to do before monday. How about Monday night? Fine. Jan. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel