Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 17:05 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:

> I think it's worth waiting at least a day to see if anybody has
> any suggestions.  I mean, if there's a "I'm trying a new version
> of the website, please watch urls containing /website/ closely!"
> check-box on the google analytics website, it would be silly not
> enable that.

Sure.

> Also: how many flashing "help wanted" signs do we have on the
> website right now?  If the -devel community wanted, we could
> certainly resolve them all in 2-3 days.  Is it worth doing that
> before switch websites?  Maybe, maybe not.

I vote not.

> What, just a 's/web/website/' in ~/web/.htaccess ?  I expected it
> to be a bit more involved than that (although still less than 10
> lines).

Hmm, possibly we could even do

    mv web old-web && mv website web

and update your update scripts accordingly :-)
website is such a long word, no?

> sorry, too much work to do before monday.  How about Monday night?

Fine.

Jan.


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to