We have a new CG chapter for administration: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/administrative-policies
In particular, it lays out the responsibilities for the Meisters (Bug, Doc, Translation, and Frog), and gives the "completion status" of the CG chapters. This basically means whether you should bother asking for opinions+review before making changes in git. Do not change (other than spelling mistakes) without discussion: * Introduction to contributing * Working with source code * Issues Please dump info in an appropriate @section within these manuals, but discuss any large-scale reorganization: * Compiling * Documentation work * Regression tests * Programming work Totally disorganized; do whatever the mao you want: * Website work * LSR work * Release work * Administrative policies Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel