On 5/28/10 2:29 PM, "n.putt...@gmail.com" <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kieren,
>
> I don't think we can remove the link between 'line-thickness and
> underline offset, since it should scale based on staff-size. At small
> staff-sizes, 'line-thickness gets progressively larger, which matches
> the thicker underline with a slightly bigger gap.
Couldn't we define the offset as a multiple of 'line-thickness, instead of
an absolute value? That's how fret diagrams are scaled.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1347041/diff/1/2#newcode301
> scm/define-markup-commands.scm:301: (y (* -1 offset))
(y (* thick (- offset)))
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
