On 5/18/10 1:53 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:12:34AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>> Should the FDL be added to Snippets and/or Internals?
>
> No, because Snippets is explicitly public domain, as stated in the
> second sentence of the manual description.
>
> I can't immediately find any notice for Internals, so let's just
> make it public domain to avoid the hassle. Unless you really
> *want* to start modifying the scheme procedures that generate the
> IR (which would be excellent if you were interested), in which
> case we could make it FDL just to give you something to do.
It would not be hard to add text to make it FDL. It's all in
scm/documentation-generate.scm, and it includes macros.itexi,
so all you'd have to do is include the appropriate macro (we *do* have a
macro for the FDL terms, don't we?).
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
