Carl Sorensen:
...
> I've posted a patch on Rietveld. Can you do the
> regression test?
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1195044
After a make test-redo I get:
. the "mandatory" output-distance.
. a diff of tree.gittext, showing Carls patch
. 314 below threshold
. 2062 unchanged
>From this I assume Carls patch does not affect any present regression
test.
***
But I also notice that there are no test for the present problem.
Perhaps one should be added?
The one presented in the report[1] could be a candidate, comments?
\version "2.12.1" % regression: 2.10.33 and 2.8.8 are ok
{
<f'>\laissezVibrer <f a'> \arpeggio
<f'>\laissezVibrer <g a'> \arpeggio \mark "never"
<f'>\laissezVibrer <a a'> \arpeggio
<f'>\laissezVibrer <b a'> \arpeggio
\bar "||"
<f'>\laissezVibrer <f g'> \arpeggio
<f'>\laissezVibrer <g g'> \arpeggio \mark "sometimes"
<f'>\laissezVibrer <a g'> \arpeggio
<f'>\laissezVibrer <b g'> \arpeggio
\bar "||"
<f'>\laissezVibrer <f f'> \arpeggio
<f'>\laissezVibrer <g f'> \arpeggio \mark "always"
<f'>\laissezVibrer <a f'> \arpeggio
<f'>\laissezVibrer <b f'> \arpeggio
}
***
I also note that input/regression/laissez-vibrer-ties.ly has a bar
check failure:
\relative c' {
<c e g>\laissezVibrer r4
<c f g>\laissezVibrer r
<c d f g>\laissezVibrer r
<c d f g>4.\laissezVibrer r % here we get a bar check failure
In Documentation/snippets/laissez-vibrer-ties.ly we have a r8 at that
point, otherwise thoose two are basically the same.
What was the point of having a bar check failure in the regression
test?
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
[1] http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=881
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
