On 5/5/10 6:11 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:04:42PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 5/5/10 12:01 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, <carl.d.soren...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I think it's an improvement. I've made specific comments inline. >>> >>> sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every single example?! >>> >>> cis4 ees fisis, aeses | >> >> For the Learning Manual, I would dispense with *all* final barline checks. > > I wouldn't go that far. Compare: > r8 | r4. r4 c8 | a'([ g)] f f([ e)] d | e([ d)] c bes' | > with > r8 | r4. r4 c8 | a'([ g)] f f([ e)] d | e([ d)] c bes' > > I'd rather have the first type; the final barline check just > reassures you that everything matches up. OK. Final barline checks on examples where they add to the clarity of *that particular* examples would be fine with me. But when I reviewed the patch, I felt that the final bar checks actually got in the way for me on virtually every example. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
