On Mon, 03 May 2010 09:02:55 0200, David Kastrup wrote: "Boris Shingarov" <b...@shingarov.com> writes:
> Markup functions being able to return a list of stencils.
> > Markup lists don't do the trick here? No; if you look at patch 207105, you'll see what I mean.
I don't see that you stand a chance with the standard processes here.
[...] > Basically you'll be on your own going against the tide until you are > finished. The work flows here are designed to achieve code quality by > making it harder for a would-be contributor to get sub-par code through, > not by making others participate with the work.
I guess even that assessment is overly optimistic. The real problem here is not of process, but of fundamental interests. I am scratching *my* itch, which is, make top-publication-grade work possible with Lilypond. Lilypond did not reach this grade before. So this work is beneficial to the Lilypond community in two ways: proving we can go on that territory, as well as purely technical contributions. Now, with technical contributions that are easy enough to integrate back upstream, ok I can spend the extra 30% effort to integrate; but 500% does not seem justifiable and then we take the GPL as the guideline: here is the new code, enjoy doing whatever you please with it. But I am open to any suggestion how to make it more useful to the community. Boris _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
