On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:05:36PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Please, please, don't ever wonder about this. If anybody finds > > anything in the archives that might possibly be useful: add it to > > LSR. Don't stop to wonder. Don't think. Do not pass go. Just add > > it to LSR. > > Adding to the LSR is always useful, but in this case you've missed my > point (and I wasn't clear enough): The original problem is a bug, and > Kieren's solution essentially circumvents it in a nifty way. So my > question is basically whether we shall document his workaround, thus > making it sacrosanct...
Ah, I did indeed miss that point. However, adding a bug workaround to LSR or even to the .itely files themselves doesn't make the bug (or workaround) sacrosanct; we've fixed bugs and eliminated workarounds like this in the past. As long as the snippet text clearly states that this is a bug workaround and might be obsolete in the future, I see no problem whatsoever. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
