Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com> writes: > Carl Sorensen wrote: >> I'm OK with that, but I still have the concern of >> documenting it. What do we need to do to make sure that >> the documentation works properly? > > I don't think it's worth it. There are too many > documentation issues. I made a tiny change to > tutorial.itely as a test; I just put a couple of these > characters in @samp block. The characters display nicely in > html, but here are some problems I've found: > > 1) the characters don't display at all in pdf. > 2) only half of the characters display in info. > 3) gitk renders the commit with some weird escape sequences. > > Not sure if the gitk issue translates to any real problem, > but the first two are obvious non-starters. I've attached > some images to demonstrate.
We will get into trouble with documenting Hebrew lyrics and other things at one time then, I guess. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel