I know it looks weird, but I changed the "@" characters to "8" to prevent the list archive from substituting "addr...@hidden" all over the place. The thread at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00384.html is practically unreadable because of this. At least this way you can figure it out (but you'll have to do a mental 's/8/@/g' to get it).
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Yes, but I think it would be a good habit that the @w > encloses what is to be said. If I'm not misunderstanding, > it would allow us to use > > 8w{8command{run} 8var{variable}} > > instead of > > 8command{run}8tie{}8var{variable} Apparently this behavior is fixed for the next release of texi2html: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/texi2html/2010-02/msg00000.html I guess that means that, with the new-and-improved @w{}, we'll be able to completely get rid of @tie{}? That would be great. The next step will be to see if the texinfo developers would be interested in changing the specification of @code{} and @command{} to automatically imply 8w{8code{}} and 8w{8command{}}, since (as I understand it) codes and commands that don't fit on a single line should use @example or @verbatim anyway. It's clearly not a necessity, since the functionality will already be provided by @w, and a firm "no we won't" would hardly surprise me, but it's an interesting thought. - Mark _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel