On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:02:11PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno mar, 16/02/2010 alle 15.23 +0000, Trevor Daniels ha scritto: > > The change seems to have started after commit > > c258b7788db8a717b4741f02d9f5cc52862338d4 > > which was applied by John on Christmas Eve. > > As part of his tidying up, the option list is > > sorted in line 1236, which places the line-width > > lines in a different order, and causes the default > > to be applied after the override, rendering the > > override ineffective. I'll push a fix to comment > > out the sort for now, until John can check this > > out more carefully. > > Unless the docs output caused by this issue is unbearable
It's not. I'm perfectly happy releasing 2.14 with this. > even during the two days it may take me to fix it from now, > please don't commit this so-called fix. I'm also unhappy with this fix, although for completely different reasons. There's no good reason to increase the line-width. 1) if the larger line-width looks good on all output, then it should be the default. 2) if it doesn't work on *all* outputs... HTML, info, pdf, pdf printed on A4, pdf printed on USletter, HTML on a screen with 800 pixels wide... then the music should be changed to fit the available space. A thorough examination of the lilypond-book paper options for the docs would be a bit more work than I think we want to do at the moment. I've added it as issue 1015. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
