Ian Hulin schrieb:
Hi Marc,
On 15/02/10 18:32, Marc Hohl wrote:
Ian Hulin schrieb:
[...]
Secondly, what I had in mind was this kind of thing:
* \dalsegno and \dacapo - both of these start off a segno/dacapo
section. I know it's a bit weird that the \dacapo command would
have to be at the start of the score, but I think it would be
beneficial in terms of syntax checking.
* \dalsegno and \dacapo both take a keyword and a music expression
as parameters. The keyword is either /coda/, /fine/ or it is
omitted. If it is omitted it defaults to /fine/.
* \fine - checks if a \dacapo or \dalsegno block are current and
that the last \dalsegno or \dacapo used a /fine/ keyword. If so
it, generates a double bar and "Fine" markup.
* \tocoda - checks if a \dacapo or \dalsegno block are current,
and that the last \dalsegno or \dacapo used a /coda/ keyword.
If so it generates a double bar and "Al ©" markup. (For © read
the coda hot-cross-bun sign).
* \endDaCapo, \endDalSegno terminate the block. They firstly
check if a block is current, and what kind of keyword was used.
If the block was started with a /fine/ keyword, it generates a
double bar and a markup "Dal Segno"|"Da Capo" al "Fine"|"Coda",
depending on the type of block and the keyword parameter used.
o If the coda keyword was used a \break is generated and the
© markup generated ready for the next music expression.
Comments welcome.
Hi Ian,
I have also thought about implementing this properly.
I had the idea to extend the \repeat syntax:
\repeat segno {.A.}
\alternative {{ .B. }{ .C.}}
could start part A with a segno sign, draw a coda sign at the start
of B,
creates a markup or something similar saying "D.S. al ø-ø", then
does (perhaps) a line break and draws the corresponding coda symbol
at the beginning of part C.
(And if there is no music before part A, this could become "Da Capo"
and no segno signs are drawn).
Not all D.S. or D.C. blocks end with a jump to a Coda, would you want
to have another parameter
\repeat segno coda-or-fine-keyword {A}
\alternative {{B} {C}}.
Also don't \repeat and \alternative at the moment have potential
problems with which \alternative strictly belongs to which repeat,
because there is no explicit function to end the block?
Or were you relying on the whether \alternative has a single music
expression or a list of music expressions to determine whether you're
dealing with Al Coda (if it's a list) or Fine (if there's one music
expression)?
I can see the attraction of using \repeat since it is conceptually
closely related to what happens for segnos and codas, but I feel if we
go down this route, the \repeat and \alternative functions risk
getting overloaded to the extent that they may become difficult to
document and therefore hard for users to learn to use.
After reading through the other posts, I think that overloading \repeat
would not cover *all* possible
cases. On the other hand, there should be *one* consistent way of doing
any kind of repeats.
David's comparison with goto-like structures seems to be the right
approach, so I revert my
proposal about enhancing \repeat for a more universal structure.
[...]
It was your work on issue 659 that started me thinking about this stuff.
:-)
Grüsse aus England,
Thanks!
Greetings from Germany,
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
