On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> I don't think that this is useful advice since binaries often are >>> incompatible with Scheme/Lilypond trees of other versions, and since >>> many regressions are not introduced in the binaries. >> >> Trevor meant the GUB packages, which install the "actual binary" >> as well as the scheme stuff, fonts, etc. > > Then the proper wording is "downloading binary releases" or "binary > packages". But "binaries" means something different.
I think this is nitpicking; we don't release just the binary files separately; people'd have to go through contortions to do what you think is suggested. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
