Hi Graham, I hope you don't mind my answering. I feel/am responsible for this as it was my idea.
> Why did you remove tab and percussion clefs from the clef section? > The general idea is that anything that could make sense in NR 1 > goes there, other than ancient notation, and NR 2 links back to NR > 1 in the relevant "references for..." subsection. I moved the tab clef to fretted-strings and the percussion clef to percussion for the following reasons: 1) (in a strict sense) they don't display pitches (1.1.3 Displaying pitches) 2) In their contexts they are set by default. So it's rather a specialist notation to set them manually in a normal staff. 3) They are special purpose clefs. They don't make sense (to me) in a normal staff. 4) the examples in the clef section were a bit confusing as pitch 'c' is displayed on the middle line of the staff when these two clefs are used. > > I won't complain about adding a tab clef to fretted-strings (as > long as it's in a sensible place within the file; I haven't check > that). Well, I hope I found one in Custom tablature. As the tab clef is set by default I wanted to show that it's possible to switch back to the default clef after having chosen the modern tab clef. I doubt that anybody would like to use two different tab clefs in one staff/score. But it's possible… patrick > But removing those non-ancient clefs from Clef is not ok. > > Cheers, > - Graham > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
