On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Michael Käppler <xmichae...@web.de> wrote:
> I have also a file which I am unable to compile because it doesn't finish > even in 12 hours and more. In the thread you mentioned I was pointed to my > insufficient memory size. However, what I notice is that compiling time > seems to increase in an exponential way with larger scores. Is this only a > result of my bad system specs? > > Three points: > > 1. It would be very interesting to create a "Lilypond benchmark suite" to > help objectifying such questions as you, Trevor, have started. > In the nicest case it could be ran on different builds automatically to see > whether there are huge changes between different releases. > > 2. I encounter a strange behaviour that nobody was able to explain up to > now. Simply spoken: a lilypond foo1.ly foo2.ly foo3.ly foo4.ly is much >>slower< than a lilypond foo1.ly && lilypond foo2.ly && lilypond foo3.ly && > lilypond foo4.ly. Normally I would expect the opposite. (e.g. LilyPond does > not need to load fonts several times ...) It sounds like we may be leaking memory somewhere again. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
