On 1/24/10 6:49 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 1/23/10 11:10 PM, "Mark Polesky" <markpole...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I wrote a little shell script to rebase all my local git
>> branches at once. However, reading the git-pull man page
>> makes me wonder if there's not some tragedy waiting to
>> happen. The script is designed for developers who are only
>> tracking the `master' branch (translators shouldn't rebase
>> too casually anyway).
>>
>> So, is this a dumb idea for some reason? Or is it useful
>> enough to add to scripts/auxiliar/? Right now, I have six
>> local branches, and individually doing `git pull -r' was
>> just getting me down. Actually, this script speeds up the
>> process even more: it only pulls for `master', then rebases
>> the other branches to the updated local master (which is
>> much faster than pulling for each).
>
> So does the script rebase all branches in a repository?
Oops -- embarrassed, red face -- I missed the attachment due to a shift in
mail clients.
The script is cool, and nicely written, and appears safe to me.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
