Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 14:49 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > For unstable, yes. But they're not all that cheap for stable -- I > mean, I'd expect many users to update to a new stable version. But > there's absolutely no functional difference between 2.12.3 and the > hypothetical 2.12.4. The only difference is in the source, doc, and > web doc.
This is true, but version numbers (excluding the release number added by GUB) are not only intended for users: package maintainers may want to see that the source package changes, which won't happen if you release a 2.12.3-2. And I wouldn't care about requesting users to update as long as they know through the release announcement and/or a news item that only the docs translations change from their point of view. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
