On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Valentin Villenave <v.villen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Don't load this as a picture into firefox on X11. It is something like >> 10000x10000 pixels, and apparently firefox allocates a full-size >> display-depth pixmap for that, making the server swallow more than 1.2G >> of memory. >> I managed to kill the firefox process by now. It was not pretty. > > I had a look without any problem (well, perhaps having a 64-bit CPU > with lots of memory helps in this regard :-). > > Carl, Marc, how would that affect the regtests-checking process? When > applying this patch all outputted PNGs will look different than > before, so isn't there a risk that some actual regressions go > unnoticed?
The regression comparison is not generated from the .PNG files, but rather from the Stencil bounding boxes at the end of the formatting process. I suspect that the change does not affect the clef's bounding box. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
