Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 à 00:00 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > It's _just_ possible that some change won't be picked up by "make" and > will require a rebuild from scratch, but this only occurs once or > twice a year.
True, "make" is known to be more robust than "make doc" in non-clean builds. > If "make" ever ends with an error, just send it to > lilypond-devel. ... and monitor -devel list for messages about infrastructure changes where a developper explicitly requests everybody to make clean. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
