2009/12/21 Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>: > CG 1.1.3 "Main source code" suggests putting the `master' > branch in a dir called `lilypond/': > > $ mkdir lilypond; cd lilypond > $ git init > > > CG 1.1.4 "Documentation translations source code" suggests > putting the `lilypond-translations' branch in a dir called > `lilypond-translation/': > > $ mkdir lilypond-translation; cd lilypond-translation > $ git init > > > In reality, contributors working with both branches should > have them in the same directory, right? There's no need > for having two repos, one for each branch, or am I missing > something? > > Also, the `~/lilypond/' dir is for the installed program > files, so I keep my repo in `~/Repositories/lilypond/', as > if I have other repos that I'm working on (I don't). > > But even so, referring to the repo dir as `lilypond' is a > little misleading, no? What do you guys use, `~/lilyrepo/'?
I have both master and lilypond/translation as branches in \source\lilypond -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com No le des el mando a distancia a Microsoft. No utilices Windows 7. http://windows7sins.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
