Trevor Daniels wrote: > Actually, I don't think rebase is mentioned in the CG. I > can't see it on a quick trawl. It should be, as a branch > should be rebased before a patch is generated from it if > master has been updated since the branch was created, else > inadvertent reverts might be included. > > I'll have a closer look tomorrow to see what should be > done.
Trevor, you should know that I might be restructuring the CG quite a bit in the coming days... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-12/msg00487.html - Mark p.s. why are all these replies coming in twice? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
