On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:56:47PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Okay, I'll write a patch. But I just thought of something.
> Should the `espressivo' script also be de-quantized, since
> it's (in some ways) an extension of the accent sign? I'm
> not aware of any mention of the `espressivo' sign in any
> notation reference book, and humorously, the only meaningful
> hits when googling for "espressivo sign" are all from LP.
It was added as a short-cut hack for
<< c1 {s4\< s s\> s\!} >>
I was somewhat surprised that the patch was accepted in the first
place, although part of the reason might have been because it was
a relatively new contributor. (IIRC -- this was 4 or 5 years
ago)
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
