On 2009/12/06 17:23:13, nicolas.sceaux wrote:
When dealing with a simple_chord_element (simple notes, rests, etc) or
a
note_chord_element (chord with several notes), the parser updates the
memorized
chord by calling a user-settable memorization function (see
parser.yy).
I think it is the wrong way to go if notes can only be guessed if you know what user-settable memorization function is in effect. We should not sacrifice readability for the sake of saving a few keystrokes. q should have fixed, simple, understandable semantics even if that means that it saves fewer keystrokes in border situations. Having its meaning change on demand, in particular when this might affect \relative octaves, is a bad idea. Write-only music is not a good idea. http://codereview.appspot.com/164096 _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
