Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-l...@xs4all.nl> writes: > Op donderdag 12-11-2009 om 08:55 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David > Kastrup: >> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-l...@xs4all.nl> writes: > >> > I'm not sure the solution to remove al older v2.9 etc. from google is >> > a smart thing to do. >> >> I think it is much better than the alternatives. > > Does that include the alternative: Google fixes their alpha/numerical > sorting blunder (v2.9 is bigger and thus more important than v2.12)?
Yes. > Possibly we can help google with that, by adding a date to each page. > Possibly there is another way to make google favour v2.12 pages over > v2.9 without having to pull v2.9 alltogether? Putting v2.9 into robots.txt does not "pull v2.9 alltogether". It means that only _we_ rather than search engines will link to it, and can tell people just _what_ to expect when following those links. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
