On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 07:56:11PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 novembre 2009 à 00:30 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > It seems to work. I had to change all the @ref{} in the text, but
> > it looks fine now.
>
> Barring well-argumented opposition, I'm going to revert this and apply
> the patch below, as completely downcasing titles — node names are some
> kind of titles, they are used in Info as titles, at least — is really
> quite ugly.
oh, FFS. Your solution is so ridiculously easy. I want to go and
drunk myself unconscious (especially after discovering that the
online doc target is broken in 2.13.7).
... which would be perfectly normal behavior in Glasgow, if only I
drank alcohol. Curses, foiled again!
(yes, please revert the lower-case patches from Jan and me, and
use yours)
> > > Renaming a directory should be a simple
> > > mv and M-x tags-search-replace.
> >
> > NB: a simple replace **in the same directory**, no less. Not some
> > kind of ../stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-targets.make or
> > ../doc-i8n3d-targets.maek
>
> What do you mean?
I'm complaining again about wanting to change something about the
docs, and needing to look in
Documentation/GNUmakefile
make/doc-i8n-blah.make
stepmake/stepmake/texinfo-*.make
scripts/buildscript/*.py
python/auxiliary/*.py
Just ignore me.
> > Agreed -- but there's no /general dir in the output.
>
> I already pointed out that this scheme doesn't work for online target,
> as there is a conflict between MANUAL.html and MANUAL/index.html. I'll
> undo the change that bring general.texi output one directory higher,
> unless you do so sooner.
No. The solution is to move the docs one directory lower:
index.html
learning.html
docs/learning/index.html
(or maybe docs-v2.13, or maybe v2.13... whatever)
I'll make a first pass at this on the weekend, and send a patch
here for discussion.
> > I'm open to renaming "general.tely", but nobody could think of a
> > better name last June or July when we were contemplating such a
> > change.
>
> We weren't contemplating this at all, we're arguing about technical
> issues more important than the name of the website sources.
I thought that Jan was complaining about the "general" name.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
