On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:23:12PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Quoting John Mandereau <john.mander...@gmail.com>: > >> Le dimanche 27 septembre 2009 à 19:08 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : >>> I'm wondering if we can call them "Function index" and "Concept >>> index". Or something like that. It just seems weird to have a >>> "LilyPond index" for every manual. >> >> Maybe "Function and concept index", as this index actually merges >> concept index and function index? I'm not sure this is better than >> "LilyPond index". > > Still, it would be much better if we simply could call it "Index". Do > we still have the silly technical problem that this would translate > into file called index.html in the web version?
Yes... what about naming them by the book name? Learning manual index, Notation reference index, etc? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
