On 9/20/09 9:41 AM, "Valentin Villenave" <v.villen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: >> This seems like a good idea to me. However, I'm not really strong on parser >> variables. But if this does work, I think it would be an improved way of >> handling point-and-click, because, as you say, it would tie into the >> existing LilyPond syntax. > > I could update the tracker page accordingly... Can you guys help me? :-) I think that we shouldn't yet add a tracker for the general solution. We're still working on the output-suffix issues, which might have a more general solution. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output-suffix a... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output-suffix a... Neil Puttock
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output-suf... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output... Ian Hulin
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define ou... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Defin... Ian Hulin
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: ... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement reque... Ian Hulin
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement reque... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement reque... Valentin Villenave
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement reque... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement reque... Valentin Villenave
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define ou... Neil Puttock
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output... Neil Puttock
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define ou... Carl Sorensen
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Defin... Patrick McCarty
- Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output... Joe Neeman