On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 09:36:47PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Please don't speak for me. I am not opposed to GPL v3, but I don't > want to be involved in any of the legal (or > laymen-people-interpreting-law) and bikeshedding discussions that this > 'upgrade' has to involve. Ie. please reach consensus without me.
Unlike Han-Wen, I *am* interested in armchair lawyering, but this thread began at an incredibly unfortunate time for me[1]. I have major problems with the direction this discussion took about 20 emails ago, but require more time before I can examine the issues closely. I know you all want to rush ahead on this, but this is one issue which will not be rushed. Later today, I have the choice of working on GUB and dealing with this thread; I will prioritize GUB (and therefore making releases, particularly ones with fixed OSX 10.5 for both 2.13 and 2.12). I know that some people might be disappointed by delaying any meaningful discussion on this issue[2] for another day or two, but I think the vast majority of users and developers would much rather get 2.13.4 and 2.12.3 out the door. Cheers, - Graham [1] http://percival-music.ca/blog/2009-09-14-my-kingdom-for-a-towel.html [2] yes, I am unapologetically calling the past few days' worth of discussion on this issue non-meaningful. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
