On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Michael Käppler <xmichae...@web.de> wrote: > Hi Neil, > I'm fine with all your comments... >> >> The regression test would probably benefit from being split into >> several separate tests, particularly the final check-consistency >> setting, which can then have #(ly:set-option 'warning-as-error #f) >> added to it in anticipation of the mythical time when we can switch >> this option on for regression testing. :) > > ...however, I don't really understand the benefit of splitting the regtest. > Do you propose to have separate files for each combination of settings? > > And if warning-as-error was set to true, the regtest would fail. I don't > think that is intended, since the >absence< of the warning would be wrong > behaviour, not the appearance.
If you *want* the warning(s) for regtests, add #(ly:set-option 'warning-as-error #f) as Neil suggested. Eventually, this option will be set to #t for regtest compilation, thus the need for overriding the default behavior. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
