On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 01:05 +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > In light of recent suggestions to change LilyPond's copyright to GPLv2 > > or later, I am reminded of the Ghostscript 8.70 announcement to > > gs-devel back in July. > > > > Thoughts? > > Yes. My thoughts are "could people reading the maoing previous > discussions already?!?!". > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-07/msg00009.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-05/msg00085.html > > If somebody is SERIOUSLY interested in this, and is SERIOUSLY > willing to spend around 50 hours working on the paperwork, and > SERIOUSLY wants to pester everybody to fill out their share of the > paperwork, and SERIOUSLY wants to figure out what to do about > casual or new contributors... then fine. Step forward. > > > If you meant ghostscript in particular, then I guess we'll have to > stay with ghostscript <8.70 for now.
We don't link to ghostscript -- we merely call the command line program -- so the GPL doesn't apply. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
