2009/8/23 Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>:
> Okay to apply?
No, since you've changed the names of function arguments while leaving
the original names in the body of the function:
- 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM name),
- "Return the definition of @var{name} (a symbol) within"
+ 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob),
- 3, 1, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob, SCM eltprop, SCM val),
- "Do a single @code{\\override} or @code{\\revert} operation"
- " in @var{context}. The grob definition @var{grob} is extended"
- " with @var{eltprop} (if @var{val} is specified) or reverted"
- " (if unspecified).")
+ 3, 1, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob, SCM property, SCM value),
- 3, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM name, SCM val),
- "Set value of property @var{name} in context @var{context}"
- " to @var{val}.")
+ 3, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM property, SCM value),
- (SCM context, SCM name),
- "Unset value of property @var{name} in context @var{context}.")
+LY_DEFINE (ly_context_unset_property, "ly:context-unset-property",
+ 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM property),
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
