On 8/13/09 10:42 AM, "John Mandereau" <john.mander...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 21:19 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
>> And if makelsr.py hasn't been done, LilyPond will get the snippet from
>> Documentation/snippets/new instead of Documentation/snippets.
>
> This is wrong --
Thank you for the clarification.
> see LILYPOND_BOOK_INCLUDES in make/lilypond-vars.make
I try not to look at any of the make files; it's hopeless for me to
understand them. I'm glad you do, though.
> -- and not needed anyway: anyone can run makelsr.py without argument
> from top of the source tree to get changes from input/new and
> Documentation/<LANGUAGES>/texidocs into Documentation/snippets.
Yes, this is what the CG recommends now.
I misunderstood what input/new did. My current understanding is that it's
not a place for the documentation to get snippets. It's rather a place for
makelsr.py to get source material for snippets in Documentation/snippets,
and a place to store snippets that will need to be manually changed when the
LSR is updated.
Is this the right understanding?
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
