My "concept glossary" idea is now called a "technical glossary". I thought the name was fine when it was suggested, but now I'm realizing something -- I'd also like it to list terms that are not specifically dealing with LilyPond *internals*. Such as:
the archives the LSR the tracker Rietveld Savannah These include words in the LP "vernacular". So when someone comes across one of these terms in the archives for example, they'll have a place to look up the definition. I believe that a central location for such jargon definitions will be very valuable. If they don't fit in a "technical glossary" than we should change the name of the glossary. Because I don't expect that anyone is in favor of adding yet another appendix? Although an argument could be made for compartmentalizing the resources... Thoughts? - Mark _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel