Patrick McCarty wrote Sunday, August 09, 2009 3:36 AM
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:21:42PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hmm, I just realized that the inconsistency still exists, even
with my
patch. Here's an example:
\relative c'' {
a8 a a a
a8 a a a
a16 a a8 a a
a8 a16 a a8 a
a8 a a16 a a8
a8 a a a16 a % beaming is different
}
Yes, the basic problem still remains. The look-ahead is
only to the next note. When this is a quaver there is no
rule which dictates a beam break of quavers at 1/4 and 3/4.
Fixing this goes rather deeper than the autobeaming rules.
There is an analogous effect with 16th and 32nd notes:
try a32 a a16 a a a a32 a a16 a a a a32 a a16 a a a a32 a
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
