On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:59:50AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > A few people talked about browsing the history, which surprised > me. Whenever I want to look at history, I use the web git > interface. But evidently other people don't share my pathological > hatred of git, so I guess that "availability of history" is a > non-insignificant factor.
I actually like git. :-) But then again, it's the only VCS I've really ever used, so I can't make too many comparisons. > Taking the above into consideration, I suggest that we don't > change anything: CG 1 will only discuss method #3 (git remote > add). 67 megs is still much larger than I'd _like_ to ask > potential typo fixers to download, but this seems unavoidable. :( I think that's a good idea. Even though a shallow clone is a much smaller download, I would prefer having the full git history on my local machine. IMO, method #3 is a good compromise, since it retrieves the full history just for that particular branch. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
