On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:29:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le jeudi 06 août 2009 à 13:51 +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit : > > No, big pages should link to the other big pages. That's how the current > > .init > > file is supposed to work. If it doesn' t, then that' s a bug in the script > > and > > needs to be fixed. > > But does the web site in one large page makes sense?
general.texi is a manual. It happens to be the first manual that people should read, but IMO it's still a manual. My opinion is that we should still produce one large page for this, but I'm not too concerned either way. > > Why one large file? I thought it should be one large file per manual, with > > the > > xrefs going between those large files. > > You think right, IIUC Graham and I never meant anything else. Yes -- possibly the confusion arose from "general.html", by which I meant "the one large file for the manual produced by general.texi", rather than "the one large file that is generally everything". :) > > Or am I misunderstanding what is being said? > > You 're right in theory, but from a practical point of view, current > web-texi2html.init makes big page without navigation bars, Sounds fine to me. I suggest that we just go with this and add the @rgeneral links. If somebody wants to hack stuff to get navbars in the large page at a later date, they can do that. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
