On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > GUB won't be moved into lilypond git, and web stuff will live in > master and stable. So currently we're only looking at creating > one extra repo: > ...@sv/lilypond/lilypad.git > description: Lightweight editor for lilypond files > > However, I started wondering about all the old history that would > be lost when we delete web/ and (to a much lesser extent) > web-gop/. That also reminded me of dev/rune, which I find myself > reluctant to delete.
> description: Old material for lilypond I don't understand this action. In general the whole purpose of having a source code control system is to _have_ an archive old material. Why do you want to delete old stuff, or move it into a different repo where nobody will be able to find it? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
