On do, 2009-07-30 at 03:02 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:47:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Interesting idea. They still flow onto a second layer, but it's > certainly a step in the right direction. > (yes, I still claim that 800 pixels wide should be big enough for > everybody. :) Yes, it's still too wide :-) > Why not make it a patch for web-texi2html.init ? That's how we do > all the other overriding stuff for texi2html. That sounds like a good idea. It may even be that someone can pull this off [I won't] :-) > Technical issues aside, I like the shorter names -- so why don't > we use them as the node names? Even better idea. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
