On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:31:45PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2009/7/27 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > > Lilypond Syntax Development (tentative name) > > How about "Grand Syntax Project", for Graham-ish consistency's sake? :-)
LSD is much nicer than GSP, though. > > Reinhold and Frederick: as you may have guessed, I'm proposing > > that your patch waits until 3.0. Anything requiring such manual > > tweaks will make some people very unhappy, such as mutopia. > > Another possibility would be to have a "3.0 release meister", who > could start maintaining a separate alpha branch for major > syntax-breaking changes only, while non-syntax work goes on on 2.16. > While maintaining LilyPond 2.x remains the absolute priority, this > would allow us to take our time with the other branch. Not necessary. Most of the work (time-wise) will be discussing potential changes. Once we've decided what changes to make, it shouldn't take more than 2-3 months to get them done. That's eminently within the devel time between stable releases -- I mean, it's even within the aggressive schedule I proposed last Jan. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
