On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Neil Puttock<n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/21 Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>: >> I rewrote x11-color.scm so that now the color-list is generated >> semi-automatically. It's more organized, easier to read, and less >> than a quarter of its original size. But does my approach slow >> things down at all? Measurably? I figure the current version is >> probably faster because no calculations need to be made during the >> definition of the color-list. But I don't have a good sense of the >> impact of this. I'm not posting a patch here because I'm pretty >> sure it would be way too big for the list-server. >> >> Anyway, please comment if you can. > > Very nice. :) > > A good (but tedious) test of whether it's impacting on compile times > would be to compare doc builds with and without the changes, since > there are so many LilyPond invocations for the snippets. >
It sure looks nice, but since x11-color.scm is basically dumb data, this change introduces more places where bugs could hide. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
