On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:41:32PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> Does this still compile the lilypond examples? That would take >> take much longer than 10-30 seconds. > > I'm able to copy to different location and compile certain files by > themselves as long as they don't require a bunch of @include files. They > compile very quickly this way. I wonder if it might help to define some > new Make targets. For example "make lilypond-learning.pdf" would only > compile the LM, and I would assume save quite a bit of time in compiling > over "make doc".
I was already planning on splitting the docs into Documentation/learning, Documentation/notation, etc., so that would implicitly do this anyway. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
