Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > I also took a look at the next procedure,
> > split-list-by-separator. My revised version is below. Unless I
> > hear otherwise, I'll send a patch soon.
>
> Maybe you guys can look into making a test framework for the
> Scheme library functions.
>
> It should be fairly simple to check the functions (like you do
> here ad-hoc) in a separate .scm file that is loaded if you run
> ly/test-scm-functions.ly or something similar.
Han-Wen,
I don't mean to be obtuse, but I don't quite understand what you
mean. What's a test framework? Do you mean "library" as in
lily-library, or SRFI library? By check, do you mean test/compare
results, or access, as in checkout?
Is it the define-public that bothers you? Sorry for being so
confused. But I do want to understand you clearly before I go out
on a limb, er... branch.
Thanks.
- Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
