On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Graham Percival<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm almost ready to request new git repos for lilypond, and I see > from their issue tracker that other projects have asked for this > in the past. So there seems to be no technical issues with this.
Great! > Ideally, I'd like to have: > lilyond.git/ (main) > - master > - lilypond/translations > - dev/active-developer-name (currently jneeman and kainhofer > appears to have the only active branches) > - stable/whatever > > web/ (new repo) I think this should be called "lilypond-web" if it's in a separate repo. Or else it won't be obvious what "web" refers to. I think it makes sense to have "macos-lilypad" separate from GUB, since it *is* a separate application. IMO, it should be named "lilypad" or "lilypond-lilypad". Maybe the Windows Lilypad should be integrated into the same code tree too? -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
