Patrick McCarty wrote:
> IIUC, every grob is self-contained, so it shouldn't matter which order
> they are in. Maybe in the past someone wanted to group "related"
> grobs together (like the internal grob property list), thus the
> comment.
>
> Alphabetical order makes the most sense to me in this case, with the grob
> alist.
with one exception mentioned on line 11:
;;;; WARNING: the meta field should be the last one.
- Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
